biz

Donnerstag, 1. September 2005

heise: Baidu überflügelt Google in China

Die chinesische Suchmaschien Baidu ist bei chinesischen Schülern beliebter als google. Unter anderem bietet sie eine spezielle mp3-Suche.

Auch wenn der letzte Satz bei heise etwas zu denken gibt, zeigt sich doch wieder, dass selbst der Markt für Internetsuchmaschinen noch Platz für neue Anbieter hat, wenn man nur die richtige Nische findet.

-> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/63451
-> http://www.baidu.com

Freitag, 5. August 2005

Weg von der Lohnarbeit

Während spON den Unterschied zwischen free culture movement (siehe Star Trek) und Umsonst-Kultur (siehe guenstiger.de)
nicht versteht und der bezahlte Autor verzweifelt fragt "Wieso arbeiten Leute freiwillig und ohne Lohn an einem Produkt, das es in anderer Form zu kaufen gibt?", gibt's bei Paul Graham doch glatt die Antwort:

Like open source, blogging is something people do themselves, for free, because they enjoy it.

Und interessante Folgerungen dazu:

The third big lesson we can learn from open source and blogging is that ideas can bubble up from the bottom, instead of flowing down from the top. Open source and blogging both work bottom-up: people make what they want, and the the best stuff prevails.

Does this sound familiar? It's the principle of a market economy. Ironically, though open source and blogs are done for free, those worlds resemble market economies, while most companies, for all their talk about the value of free markets, are run internally like commmunist states.


-> Paul Graham: What business can learn from open source

-> spON: 10 Dinge die umsonst sein werden

edit:

hier nun noch der Link auf die ausführliche Version von Wales Liste bei heise

-> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/62516

Montag, 25. Juli 2005

softwarepatente à la microsoft

-> heise: microsoft will smileys patentieren

der header bei heise ist natürlich etwas polemisch und trifft nicht ganz worum's geht, aber trotzdem nett.

sehr nett its auch das paper selbst.

Donnerstag, 25. November 2004

how projects are running in software engineering

alt und immer wieder schön

-> http://muetze.net/links/fun/kundenprojekte-e.html

Mittwoch, 29. September 2004

social interface designer

a job of tomorrow?

Social interface design is still a field in its infancy. I'm not aware of any books on the subject; there are only a few people working in the research side of the field, and there's no organized science of social interface design. In the early days of usability design, software companies recruited ergonomics experts and human factors experts to help design usable products. Ergonomics experts knew a lot about the right height for a desk, but they didn't know how to design GUIs for file systems, so a new field arose. Eventually the new discipline of user interface design came into its own, and figured out the concepts like consistency, affordability, feedback, etc., which became the cornerstone of the science of UI design.

Over the next decade, I expect that software companies will hire people trained as anthropologists and ethnographers to work on social interface design. Instead of building usability labs, they'll go out into the field and write ethnographies. And hopefully, we'll figure out the new principles of social interface design. It's going to be fascinating... as fun as user interface design was in the 1980s... so stay tuned.

-> http://joelonsoftware.com/articles/NotJustUsability.html

-> http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/?humans

Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004

the webapp discussion and the api war


overview

An ongoing conversation about web applications is highlighting key points about the future of computing, the web, and the industry.

...

It’s a lot to digest and that’s only scratching the surface. The obvious trend is the key to understanding the future of computing: the web is it. Servers are becoming more important than clients. While raw processor power will remain useful for applications that need it, simple and general purpose data management — including email, scheduling and time management, office applications, and all other text and information manipulation tools — will increasingly move to a globally shared environment that makes it easier to collaborate and easier to access. The recession is over, the slump is ended. Web development is in demand, and the demand is only going to increase.

-> http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/06/23/web_apps_are/index.php


the location field Is the new command line

I’ve been thinking about the rise of the web as an application platform for a while. But what hadn’t occurred to me until I read Spolsky’s essay last week is this, which I think is quite remarkable: Microsoft totally fucked up when they took aim at Netscape. It wasn’t Netscape that was a threat to Windows as an application platform, it was the web itself.

They spent all that time, money, and development effort on IE, building a browser monopoly and crushing Netscape — but to what avail? Here we are, and the web is still gaining developer mindshare at the expense of Win32.

There are certainly exceptions — banking sites come to mind — but for the most part, web apps are being built to run in any modern browser, not just IE.

I think Spolsky is very much correct that Microsoft is losing the API war. But what’s ironic is that they’re losing this war despite the fact that they won the browser war. Winning the browser war — destroying Netscape — was supposed to prevent there ever even being an API war.

-> http://daringfireball.net/2004/06/location_field


how microsoft lost the api war

However, there is a less understood phenomenon which is going largely unnoticed: Microsoft's crown strategic jewel, the Windows API, is lost. The cornerstone of Microsoft's monopoly power and incredibly profitable Windows and Office franchises, which account for virtually all of Microsoft's income and covers up a huge array of unprofitable or marginally profitable product lines, the Windows API is no longer of much interest to developers. The goose that lays the golden eggs is not quite dead, but it does have a terminal disease, one that nobody noticed yet.

...

I'm not sure how I managed to get this far without mentioning the Web. Every developer has a choice to make when they plan a new software application: they can build it for the web or they can build a "rich client" application that runs on PCs. The basic pros and cons are simple: Web applications are easier to deploy, while rich clients offer faster response time enabling much more interesting user interfaces.

Web Applications are easier to deploy because there's no installation involved. Installing a web application means typing a URL in the address bar. Today I installed Google's new email application by typing Alt+D, gmail, Ctrl+Enter. There are far fewer compatibility problems and problems coexisting with other software. Every user of your product is using the same version so you never have to support a mix of old versions. You can use any programming environment you want because you only have to get it up and running on your own server. Your application is automatically available at virtually every reasonable computer on the planet. Your customers' data, too, is automatically available at virtually every reasonable computer on the planet.

-> http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html


.NET Surprises
biz
books
gadgets
games
lyrics
quotations
random
technology
webfunde
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren